Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
BRHL Home -> BRHL2 Message Board -> Main Board -> Rerate Question...
Post Info TOPIC: Rerate Question...
Philippe27


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 920
Date:
RE: Rerate Question...
Permalink  

CBJackets wrote:

Philippe27 wrote:


Florida Panthers wrote:



CBJackets wrote:



That's actually a nice way to do it. And Maybe a guy who has 50 in 50 sees his SC decrease by 1.





It's a nice simple way, but how about something at least with a little more bite... say 1 point off for every 10 games missed.  It may sound like a lot, but I really don't think it is, in fact I'd say it's pretty generous.



Someone who would normally get an 85 in scoring gets an 82 if they miss 30 games.  An 82 is still pretty good considering you've missed more than a 3rd of the season...






If you do that for every rating it becomes a lot. I'm not exactly sure how my formulas for other ratings do it but somehow they just do. Anyways that's something to consider for Eric and Bryce.


Ya, I really don't support that, DU is supposed to take care of that. It's not perfect but players with low DU do get injured more often than players with higher DU.


A perhaps better suggestion is to adjust the DU in the ratings, right now I don't think there is a big enough gap between high durability and low durability.


If a player misses 30 games and you dock say PC, PA, and SC, well that's going to have a significant impact. Whereas if you play with durability, you can hopefully have a player play 40 or 50 games as they did in the NHL. Nothing is perfect but taking that many points away from the ratings is getting way too subjective.




I say I don't care and Bryce and Eric decide, I'll win no matter how the ratings are done.

__________________
Florida Panthers


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 296
Date:
Permalink  

CBJackets wrote:

Ya, I really don't support that, DU is supposed to take care of that. It's not perfect but players with low DU do get injured more often than players with higher DU.


A perhaps better suggestion is to adjust the DU in the ratings, right now I don't think there is a big enough gap between high durability and low durability.


If a player misses 30 games and you dock say PC, PA, and SC, well that's going to have a significant impact. Whereas if you play with durability, you can hopefully have a player play 40 or 50 games as they did in the NHL. Nothing is perfect but taking that many points away from the ratings is getting way too subjective.




DU really doesn't take care of it much, if at all though. Yes, the potential likelyhood of someone getting injured increases, but they can still go the full season without getting hurt all the same. If a player misses 30 games and is docked in PC, PA, and SC, and you drop 3 points each, the impact is still relatively minimal but has an effect. 50 points in 50 games simply isn't as impressive as 80 points in 80 games, and that should be reflected in a rerate. Afinogenov was league leader in points at 10 games in (I think it was 10 at the time)... if he's suddenly injured, should we have him as one of, if not the, highest rated players in the league? Even if it's after 20 games... it's still not realistic.

__________________
«First  <  1 2 | Page of 2  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.
BRHL Home -> BRHL2 Message Board -> Main Board -> Rerate Question...
Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse 		Powered by ActiveBoard