Portal Depth charts?

GarrettLeafs · Senior Member

Portal Depth charts?

Eric_Isles · BRHL2 Co-Commish

Off, in regards to positions?

philly · Guru

off in regards to several players being "0" years of age and only the ones with proper ages being RFA/UFA corresponding with an actual age.

Wolves GM · Senior Member

Right now the depth charts show by position but not according to actual depth. Example: Patrick O'Sullivan is not my best LW but he shows at top.

Rex is correct - ages are messed as well.

Thanks.

Avs_GM · Veteran Member

Avs_GM wrote:
Wolves GM wrote:
Right now the depth charts show by position but not according to actual depth. Example: Patrick O'Sullivan is not my best LW but he shows at top.
Rex is correct - ages are messed as well.
Thanks.
The depth chart is ranked by OV but since OV is turned off in our league they go to Potential ranking
Here is an example, the mirror site I created for testing is actually working correctly in both depth chart ranks and ages
http://brhl2.thehosthotel.com/

And player pictures too....lol

-- Edited by Avs_GM on Wednesday 28th of March 2012 10:09:56 PM

-- Edited by Avs_GM on Wednesday 4th of April 2012 06:58:33 PM

Avs_GM · Veteran Member

Wolves GM wrote:
Right now the depth charts show by position but not according to actual depth. Example: Patrick O'Sullivan is not my best LW but he shows at top.
Rex is correct - ages are messed as well.
Thanks.

The depth chart is ranked by OV but since OV is turned off in our league they go to condition ranking

Here is an example, the mirror site I created for testing is actually working correctly in both depth chart ranks and ages

http://brhl2.thehosthotel.com/depth_chart.php?team=8

GarrettLeafs · Senior Member

Just my 2 cents, but this is just another reason to just include OV on the website. Why have a depth chart page if its not accurate.

Calgary GM · Senior Member

GarrettLeafs wrote:
Just my 2 cents, but this is just another reason to just include OV on the website. Why have a depth chart page if its not accurate.

Agreed. Seems silly to me too.

Capitals GM · Senior Member

Ya I don't think many GMs would unrealistically look at overall and use that against people at this point.

Sabres_Luke · Guru

Agreed. OV is a ranking I would like to see too. In a pay league its just another tool to under or over value players that makes trading/signing players more interesting.

Eric_Isles · BRHL2 Co-Commish

OV will likely never be included for the reasons above. People use it as a tool, it's not a tool, it's a false category.

Bryce and I hate it more than Don Cherry.

Capitals GM · Senior Member

Ya but everyone knows this, and it just screws up the site hiding it.

GarrettLeafs · Senior Member

Capitals GM wrote:
Ya but everyone knows this, and it just screws up the site hiding it.

This is my biggest issue. The site is really screwed up without it listed.

Hawks GM 2 · Senior Member

I'll echo the above call to have the OVs reinstated as before. We don't necessarily have to have the OV category listed, but not having the depth chart properly working seems silly to me...

RWCordell · Senior Member

Not that this OV rating really matters to me but do we all not live in a democracy? If the majority of GM's want the rating in place, should we just not do that?