Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Intentional Tanking?


BRHL2 Co-Commish

Status: Offline
Posts: 2320
Date:
Intentional Tanking?


On a related note, and I cannot believe I have to post this

Paying or giving incentive to ANOTHER team to tank (like if you have their draft pick, or are playing against them) is absolutely outside the bounds of fair play. As per the rule book.

d. Any attempt to circumvent the spirit of the rules and fair play will result in disciplinary action handed out by the commishes office, which may includes fines, penalties, or termination.

Common sense people, in the words of Gob Bluth, "Come On!"
arrested-development-20060718034750146.jpg

-- Edited by BryceBruins on Wednesday 17th of March 2010 09:24:57 AM

__________________

bryceshuck@brhlhockey.com


     BRHL             BRHL2           BRHLE              BRHLJ
0_nhl_hockey_minnesota_wild.gif    boston-bruins-playoff-tickets.png   LogoRussiaDynamoMoscow.jpg   Edmonton.jpg



Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 278
Date:

Well, I guess I should say something here since it seems I'm getting attacked a little here as well. I agree with Luke in the context that he brings up the issue of tanking. In my opinion, there a difference between trading all your good players and icing a terrible team in the hope to finish at the bottom and putting your 4th liners on the 1st line hoping to lose. The latter, imo, is intentional tanking but I'm sure there's other that would disagree with me.

Anyways, in regards to my team, I don't consider myself to be intentional tanking. Obviously my team sucks but I'm still icing the best possible lineup that I can. Now, have I traded most of my top talent while building for the future and hurting my present lineup? Yes, absolutely. I felt it was the necessary thing to do with my team, basically tear it right down and build from scratch. Now, some will disagree with that method of building a competitive team for the future but it's my method of doing it.

In the end, if a GM has paid his dues, he should be able to run his team as he sees fit, end of story.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 991
Date:

BryceBruins wrote:

Paying or giving incentive to ANOTHER team to tank (like if you have their draft pick, or are playing against them) is absolutely outside the bounds of fair play. As per the rule book.

-- Edited by BryceBruins on Wednesday 17th of March 2010 09:24:57 AM



if there's any proof of this, i would say that the team attempting to bribe another team should have whatever they offered forfeited.... whether it's as little as half a mill or as expensive as a high draft pick as a first warning....

 



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 830
Date:

BluesGM wrote:

BryceBruins wrote:

Paying or giving incentive to ANOTHER team to tank (like if you have their draft pick, or are playing against them) is absolutely outside the bounds of fair play. As per the rule book.

-- Edited by BryceBruins on Wednesday 17th of March 2010 09:24:57 AM



if there's any proof of this, i would say that the team attempting to bribe another team should have whatever they offered forfeited.... whether it's as little as half a mill or as expensive as a high draft pick as a first warning....

 



I'd prefer to see the offending team kicked out of the league.  There is no room for that kind of **** in a pay league.

 



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 861
Date:

Calgary GM wrote:

Well, I guess I should say something here since it seems I'm getting attacked a little here as well. I agree with Luke in the context that he brings up the issue of tanking. In my opinion, there a difference between trading all your good players and icing a terrible team in the hope to finish at the bottom and putting your 4th liners on the 1st line hoping to lose. The latter, imo, is intentional tanking but I'm sure there's other that would disagree with me.

Anyways, in regards to my team, I don't consider myself to be intentional tanking. Obviously my team sucks but I'm still icing the best possible lineup that I can. Now, have I traded most of my top talent while building for the future and hurting my present lineup? Yes, absolutely. I felt it was the necessary thing to do with my team, basically tear it right down and build from scratch. Now, some will disagree with that method of building a competitive team for the future but it's my method of doing it.

In the end, if a GM has paid his dues, he should be able to run his team as he sees fit, end of story.



I don't think anyone is questioning a rebuild.  It has to happen for some teams.

What people don't like is playing Gaborik on your fourth line and Matt Bradley on your first line to intentionally try to lose a game.

Bryce has said this is acceptable though so the debate is over.

Rebuild/Selling off talent to try to draft good talent early is something everyone can understand as necessary.

 



-- Edited by Hawks_G on Thursday 18th of March 2010 09:52:57 AM

__________________

xtremehockey.wordpress.com



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 682
Date:

Now i know my team has been very crappy indeed as well and i hope i wont get accused so i will explain what im doing here now so no accuations develop.. but im playing my backup goalie a bit cause i need 600 minutes from my backup Valiquette so this is no means a way to try and keep losing im still trying to ice the best team possible.

__________________
David Barbosa Preds GM


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 991
Date:

Predsgm wrote:
but im playing my backup goalie a bit cause i need 600 minutes from my backup Valiquette


don't worry man, everyone has to do this (while some haven't started yet)....



__________________
«First  <  1 2 3 | Page of 3  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard