Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Thinking Out Load - RFA


BRHL2 Co-Commish

Status: Offline
Posts: 2320
Date:
Thinking Out Load - RFA


Had this asked to me, thought I would throw it around at you guys first.

Should we run RFA before we do the UFA process? I had a GM ask me why we don't, and I didn't have an answer.

The benefits to running it beforehand
1. Teams know their cap figure exactly going into UFA.
2. No having to track serperately what has been offered etc.
3. Allows teams affected to match or use picks to acquire players before UFA goes.

The disadvantages
1. Loses a fallback option if teams planned on going UFA route
2. Would result in increased focus, and possibly more/higher offers (could be an advantage too I guess)


Currently here are a list of true RFA players, please let me know if I have missed any.
Patrick Marleau (Col)
Brad Richards (Col)
Rostislav Olesz (Fla)
Mike Comrie (LA)



__________________

bryceshuck@brhlhockey.com


     BRHL             BRHL2           BRHLE              BRHLJ
0_nhl_hockey_minnesota_wild.gif    boston-bruins-playoff-tickets.png   LogoRussiaDynamoMoscow.jpg   Edmonton.jpg



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 781
Date:

The alternative would be to do it simultaneously with UFA?



__________________

2007-08 - missed playoffs (29th overall)
2008-09 - missed playoffs (26th overall)
2009-10 - 7th place in Western Conference (99 pts), Conference Semi-Finals
2010-11 - missed playoffs (19th overall)
2011-12 



BRHL2 Co-Commish

Status: Offline
Posts: 2320
Date:

yes

__________________

bryceshuck@brhlhockey.com


     BRHL             BRHL2           BRHLE              BRHLJ
0_nhl_hockey_minnesota_wild.gif    boston-bruins-playoff-tickets.png   LogoRussiaDynamoMoscow.jpg   Edmonton.jpg



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 701
Date:

I think it worked fine last year and dont see much in the way of big RFA bidding so most of us will just be sitting around and waiting, so I see no problem running both at the same time that is the way the NHL does it, but I will go with what ever is decided.

__________________
Season 5 BRHL 1 Champion
Season 1 BRHL Euro Champion
Season 1 BRHL Juniors Champion


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 401
Date:

I don't see a big reason to do it first, as no team is going to want to bid on an RFA while there is still a chance to sign a UFA instead.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 781
Date:

I agree - let's do RFA and UFA at the same time.



__________________

2007-08 - missed playoffs (29th overall)
2008-09 - missed playoffs (26th overall)
2009-10 - 7th place in Western Conference (99 pts), Conference Semi-Finals
2010-11 - missed playoffs (19th overall)
2011-12 



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 991
Date:

i also like it how a team may lose a RFA after bidding high on a UFA... works out well...

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 308
Date:

Having one of the few RFA's I think it should happen at the same time....it does in the "real" NHL and then I can offer contracts based on what is happening in RFA/UFA.

__________________


BRHL2 Co-Commish

Status: Offline
Posts: 2320
Date:

fair enough, we'll proceed as normal


__________________

bryceshuck@brhlhockey.com


     BRHL             BRHL2           BRHLE              BRHLJ
0_nhl_hockey_minnesota_wild.gif    boston-bruins-playoff-tickets.png   LogoRussiaDynamoMoscow.jpg   Edmonton.jpg

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard