Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: question? cap related


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2233
Date:
question? cap related


CHICAGO

Expenses


Pro Payroll$47,728,400

isnt this over the cap and the deal shouldnt have been processed?


sucks that those big deals get reversed much like NYR's did for mcdonald and mine did with schnieder sucks but the brhl has very strict rules on this one..


-- Edited by HOTLANTA at 22:01, 2007-09-13

__________________


BRHL2 Co-Commish

Status: Offline
Posts: 2768
Date:

HOTLANTA wrote:

 

CHICAGO

Expenses


Pro Payroll$47,728,400

isnt this over the cap and the deal shouldnt have been processed?


sucks that those big deals get reversed much like NYR's did for mcdonald and mine did with schnieder sucks but the brhl has very strict rules on this one..


-- Edited by HOTLANTA at 22:01, 2007-09-13

 




 The thing is Chicago sent in changes to their roster to keep them cap compliant. They also have the ability to make changes to get them cap compliant. Other deals that were reversed involved teams who couldn't demote players to relive cap space, thus allowing the deal to go through.


Apparently Kirk has nothing to do but read the rules and look for problems. Appriciated, my little Viking-lover assistant :)



__________________

"As long as those gnome elite molecules emerge, we certainly can reduce casualties. Their warplanes troops would be nice."



Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2233
Date:

i was strictly asking a question i saw i had no idea he sent guys down.

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 328
Date:

Good work sir

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard