Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: funny ratings thing i noticed.


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 2233
Date:
funny ratings thing i noticed.


who did the goaltenders passing ratings? loungo a better passer than brodeur?? niklas backstrom is also a better passing goalie than brodeur..

a funny one on a single team is john graheme a better passer than dipietro..


i just thought this was kinda humourous anyone else...

THIS ISNT ME SAYING IT SHOULD BE CHANGED JUST THOUGHT IT WAS FUNNY.. 

 PLEASE DONT GIVE ME A STRIKE FOR THIS COMMENT I GET NERVOUS WHEN IM DOWN IN THE COUNT biggrinbiggrinbiggrinbiggrin


ps this is also me board at three in the morning researching prospect stats all night  after watching the canada russia game lol and watching them on youtube hahah i know im pathetic but thats cool lol..

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 447
Date:

Norrena is the greatest stickhandling, passing goalie in Finnish history, even including today's young generation. He is constantly praised about it. But in the BRHL2 he is rated as a 60 PA confused

But we did not have a re-rates review. It's too late now.

Let's talk about starting a formal process of reviewing some ratings (e.g., 3 challenges per team) as many leagues do effectively and which we spoke about but didn't make part of the process formally. For next spring.

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 328
Date:

I'm down for this bigtime.  Its a great process for getting the numbers and players squared.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 920
Date:

The only ratings we should be allowed to challenge are ones that are done manually and not with formulas so in the case of this goalie passing thing it shouldn't be challengeable. As far as I know, only SP and SK for players should be reviewable and if there's complaints for the other ratings maybe it's just the formulas that have to be fixed.

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 991
Date:

anyways, the way i see it, although yes brodeur is better at passing than luongo, that's through puck control, not the actual passing stat.... brodeur's stat of 92 for puck control means that more of his passes will be on target than luongo who is at 85.... i would ignore the passing stats unless you have the puck control stats to back them up.....

__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 920
Date:

BluesGM wrote:

anyways, the way i see it, although yes brodeur is better at passing than luongo, that's through puck control, not the actual passing stat.... brodeur's stat of 92 for puck control means that more of his passes will be on target than luongo who is at 85.... i would ignore the passing stats unless you have the puck control stats to back them up.....




It's different for goalies, puck control is rebound control or something.



__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard