Hawks_G wrote:A blurb saying (He can play it in a pinch.) doesn't equate to evidence that a player plays the position. Jokinen is and has always been a C. I don't see why a little blurb is being used as evidence.
Yes, that's what Chicago, Philly, Atlanta and NYI would like to know.
One of us wants clarity for consistency and fairness sake in the setting of a precedent we can count on (me), one of us feels the rules are being inconsistently applied in their present loose interpretation (Rex), one of us thinks a more strict interpretation in accordance with basic reasonableness and tradition is in order (George), and one of us thinks the loose interpretation in the Jokinen case is contrary to the reality of the NHL (Kurt).
no offense but I cant believe the league is backing this up.....
sad
I don't see the big deal with all of this.. Bryce said its fine so there ya go.. ya all know for next time what will work.
This has nothing to do with you last year as this just happened now. Its not like it had a direct affect on your missing out last year.
I got ****-blocked on moving a player to a position of weakness, from a position of strength..... and you dont think that had any effect on how my teams game was simmed????
And now the rule allows for loose interpretations based on what some but-**** intern down at TSN, isnt even getting paid to do???????????
Pull your head out of your ass LA
__________________
Get ahold of me soon, or my players will already be dealt!
its a new season.. rules change.. get over it. You should have done something about it.. made another trade or something if it was such a big deal to you.
just because your teams blow and wont be competing for anything this year doesnt mean u can jump in and try to discuss stuff that happened last year, SINCE YOU DONT HAVE A ****ING CLUE.
LA, PS ryder is an UFA at the end of that contract just so everyone in the league knows....
"get over it"
rookie
-- Edited by philly at 21:17, 2007-08-09
__________________
Get ahold of me soon, or my players will already be dealt!
just because your teams blow and wont be competing for anything this year doesnt mean u can jump in and try to discuss stuff that happened last year, SINCE YOU DONT HAVE A ****ING CLUE.
LA, PS ryder is an UFA at the end of that contract just so everyone in the league knows....
"get over it"
rookie
-- Edited by philly at 21:17, 2007-08-09
Thats nice.. I can deal with that when it happens.
you are a sensitive guy i must admit.. your reaction when i didn't want to trade with you originally was interesting.
Last I checked your team missed the playoffs there too hotshot so calm the **** down. I can discuss whatever I want.
if you were paying attention you would have had time to deal with the fact that you werent allowed to play Lehtinen at center.
Btw.. I originally traded you Ryder in the first place.. so essentially.. you got Scott Hartnell for Ponikarovsky, Daley, TB 1st last draft and your first and second pick next year.. if you like thats fine.. I don't mind it.
lol, yeah youre allowed to discuss whatever you want but are clearly a rookie....
way to check out the guy you were getting via trade!!!
and apparently the reason my team missed the playoffs is because of a clerical error at BRHL2 head offices....
PS.. you dont seriously think you're gonna contend this year do you?
oh and you only need to make the playoffs to 'contend' in FHL.. and thats got nothing to do with it.. can you not discuss something rationally without taking shots at people? Obviously not.
once again you're commenting on stuff you have absolutely 100% no knowledge about....
id hate to question your GM skills
rookie
do you have any idea how long I've been in FHL leagues for? I even ran my own for 2 years so ya.. comment all ya want.. oo so you think you pawned Ryder off and got a steal.. big deal.. I don't and thats the only thing that matters to me.