pretty good but scoring forwards on the 3rd and 4th line aren't too useful. I personally like my forwards better: Alex Semin-Vincent Lecavalier-Dainius Zubrus Chris Higgins-Daniel Briere-Patrice Bergeron Tyler Arnason-Jeff Hamilton-Guillaume Latendresse Steve Begin-Vincent Lecavalier-David Backes
Philippe27 wrote: pretty good but scoring forwards on the 3rd and 4th line aren't too useful.
Don't worry. Atlanta has a whopping 13 RFA to sign among his high-performing starters and only 7-odd million cap room space in which to do it. Good luck!
And to think the sim doesn't take into account the role of defensive forwards, hitters and size, at least to a certain degree, is naive. Not a Steve begin in sight among Thrashers.
Atlanta's starting line-up ought to look very different than now projected, as we shall see.
hahahhahaha I can't believe you should BRHL hockey as your source. He's a LW. Maybe www.positionchangesforhockey.com has him as a C, and D too, but hes not RW.
My plan was to acquire young inexpensive NHL star players so that I can afford some elite UFAs to complete my roster... so far Im on track cause I have tons of cap room that a plan on using.
fill in the blanks below with guys like Jagr, Recchi Straka, Sundin etc.. and I feel i have a contender.... especially since I can afford to pay two UFAs the MAX
I know it sucks when GMs rely on UFAs to be competitive, but given the fact that BRHL2 is set up in a way where there will be many UFAs each summer, I see no issue with using this strategy,,,,just like many NHL GMs do.
HOTLANTA wrote: im not saying its a source but with him at rw i plan to not switch him unless emergency depletion to my lw's.
How did you even get him to RW? I checked all the sources and the only one that had him at RW was hockeydb.com, which didnt even have him at LW..I'm saying it wasnt like LW/RW it was only RW. Which is a complete joke because all he plays is LW.
I think these position changes rule needs a revision, you cant just take a good player and plug him in to a position they dont even play. .
I agree, some of these sources are garbage, we need to narrow down the acceptable ones. The way we are going any forward will be able to play all three of the forward positions without penalty. I don't think that the way it's suppose to work. And Huselius only plays LW
sure i agree the number should be limited to espn, nhl.com, nhlpa.com, but u cant move players teams already have set at some positions so huselius is indeed a rw
HOTLANTA wrote: sure i agree the number should be limited to espn, nhl.com, nhlpa.com, but u cant move players teams already have set at some positions so huselius is indeed a rw
HOTLANTA wrote: sure i agree the number should be limited to espn, nhl.com, nhlpa.com, but u cant move players teams already have set at some positions so huselius is indeed a rw
WHy not, if he doesnt play it?
Because you can't just switch players to another position if the GM was already told that he could play there.
Once again, its about the fairness directly to you rather than the fairness of the league..What about the teams you beat because you have bergeron at winger? Is that fair? I could see if it somehow moved their rating down like the players level of play actually drops in the nhl would be fair, but it doesnt make any sense, and i dont care what you were told. You knew full well bergeron wasnt a winger..OH so you are telling me you wouldnt have traded for bergeron had you known that? Please...you raped him in the deal.. Its obvious that he doesnt play the wing.. SO what can I move kopitar to wing next year to play with crosby? Its the stupidest thing ever. TSN should be the standard Or we keep the 6 but at least 3 of the 6 need to confirm it. One source from a semi-credible website...right..