Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
BRHL Home -> BRHL2 Message Board -> Main Board -> Veto?
Post Info TOPIC: Veto?
Philippe27


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 920
Date:
RE: Veto?
Permalink  

Fine the title may have been inppropriate and it can get annoying but I doN,t see what it wrong with discussing a deal that a GM made. We were having a civil discussion until we were told to shut the hell up.
If you don't want to take part in discussions then you don't have to come to the board, no one is forcing you to.

I think the fun part of a league is coming on the board and talking about different things with other GM's and personally I'd like to be able to do that and voice my opinion without being told to "SHUT THE HELL UP".
 You guys can criticize my deals all you want if it makes you happy and I'll make myself a pleasure of arguing them.



__________________
Hawks_G


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 861
Date:
Permalink  

Philippe27 wrote:

Fine the title may have been inppropriate and it can get annoying but I doN,t see what it wrong with discussing a deal that a GM made. We were having a civil discussion until we were told to shut the hell up.
If you don't want to take part in discussions then you don't have to come to the board, no one is forcing you to.

I think the fun part of a league is coming on the board and talking about different things with other GM's and personally I'd like to be able to do that and voice my opinion without being told to "SHUT THE HELL UP".
You guys can criticize my deals all you want if it makes you happy and I'll make myself a pleasure of arguing them.

It wasn't discussing the deal.  It was "VETO?"  You want to do a "Who won the deal?" poll on every deal, fill your boots.

 "VETO?" means that this deal should be reviewed.  And it isn't like this is the first thread like this.

 



__________________

xtremehockey.wordpress.com
Canes


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 138
Date:
Permalink  

Look both teams felt the deal was fair and both got what they wanted or needed out of the deal.

__________________
Philippe27


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 920
Date:
Permalink  

Hawks_G wrote:
Philippe27 wrote:

Fine the title may have been inppropriate and it can get annoying but I doN,t see what it wrong with discussing a deal that a GM made. We were having a civil discussion until we were told to shut the hell up.
If you don't want to take part in discussions then you don't have to come to the board, no one is forcing you to.

I think the fun part of a league is coming on the board and talking about different things with other GM's and personally I'd like to be able to do that and voice my opinion without being told to "SHUT THE HELL UP".
You guys can criticize my deals all you want if it makes you happy and I'll make myself a pleasure of arguing them.

It wasn't discussing the deal. It was "VETO?" You want to do a "Who won the deal?" poll on every deal, fill your boots.

"VETO?" means that this deal should be reviewed. And it isn't like this is the first thread like this.

 

Just like I said the title was wrong but the other than the first post, the discussion wasn't about vetoing the deal it was about who we think won the deal and why.

 



__________________
Florida Panthers


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 296
Date:
Permalink  

Philippe27 wrote:

Just like I said the title was wrong but the other than the first post, the discussion wasn't about vetoing the deal it was about who we think won the deal and why.

 

 I propose that we just put a total trade ban on the entire league so that we never have to worry about vetoing any trade ever again.



__________________
VanIslander


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 629
Date:
Permalink  

Philippe27 wrote:

I think the fun part of a league is coming on the board and talking about different things with other GM's and personally I'd like to be able to do that and voice my opinion without being told to "SHUT THE HELL UP".

Exactly.

The g.m.s of Columbus, Buffalo, Tampa and Islanders have in the past expressed CONCERNS not just CRITICISMS. We want to see changes for the good largely because we are the ones here every day. Maybe we post too much. But we CARE. And want to see this league thrive.


-- Edited by VanIslander at 19:53, 2007-01-31

__________________
devils


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 85
Date:
Permalink  

I veto Florida's idea to veto all trades and believe that we should have the veto coin. ANy deal that is attempted to be processsed will have the flip of coin to decide on whether or not the deal will actually go through. This is obviously the only fair way...

__________________
Philippe27


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 920
Date:
Permalink  

devils wrote:
I veto Florida's idea to veto all trades and believe that we should have the veto coin. ANy deal that is attempted to be processsed will have the flip of coin to decide on whether or not the deal will actually go through. This is obviously the only fair way...

I'm dying of laughter

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NOT



__________________
Florida Panthers


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 296
Date:
Permalink  

Philippe27 wrote:

I'm dying of laughter

...

 

NOT


 BLOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRPPPPPPPPPPP



__________________
«First  <  1 2 | Page of 2  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.
BRHL Home -> BRHL2 Message Board -> Main Board -> Veto?
Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse 		Powered by ActiveBoard