In the "updated draft order" thread, it just kept a running draft list for every round (seemed to stop after round 4). Any chance we can just have that (or in addition to) as opposed to having a separate thread for each round? It just makes things a heck of a lot easier when trying to look back at past rounds...
The one on this board I was updating the draft order and it wa dsmy personal version of it (from my Excel spreadsheet) but since trades are not updated as we go anymore I stoppe dupdating it.
I think he is talking about the one on the other board where it's round by round.
This draft for your pick if even if it belongs to another team is becoming ridiculous. A GM acquired one of my picks today and messaged me about whether I was going to be at the draft tonight or not to make his pick. And then he asked me if he could email me his picks and could I email them to the league.
__________________
To NYIslander: Daniel Tjarnqvist, Duvie Westcott, Ilja Bryzgalov, Pat Rissmiller, Tom Poti, Bjorn Melin, Karri Ramo, Tom Gilbert
To Boston: Chris Pronger, Doug Murray, Jocelyn Thibault, Ken Klee, Wade Brookbank, Denis Istomin, Viktor Dovgan
What I'd personally like to see is a continuation of the "updated draft order" that was going on in this board, where a continuing single list is generated and updated after each round. Philippe27 said he was doing it, but stopped doing it.
I really think it would be just as easy for the commishes to continue adding to one single list instead of a different thread for each round, plus it makes it easier for us to go back and look at the draft without having to open up 10 pages just to see 10 different rounds.
Why cant GMs be a little more self sufficient, how hard is it to copy paste each round into a document after every round? I have my own continuous list.
Sabres wrote: Why cant GMs be a little more self sufficient, how hard is it to copy paste each round into a document after every round? I have my own continuous list.
Why do some GMs feel the need to bash others for no reason what so ever?
You might have a valid point if the suggestion that I asked about caused absolutely ANY more work for the commishs when they put up the results. But it doesn't, and the fact of the matter is that it would be absolutely ZERO extra work, would be far more efficient given that a continuous list put up in one thread would be there for everyone to see as opposed to 30 people doing the same thing, and frankly would be also good as a record to keep for a long time from now and would be easily accessed in the future by anybody.
If the commishs don't want to do it, so be it. But rather than just being an ass and making a snide comment, perhaps actually look at the idea before dismissing it. Or even if you don't agree with it, there's no need to be condescending.
-- Edited by Florida Panthers at 00:17, 2006-07-26
