Some people spend time on their predraft- just because you don't have any picks doesn't mean you need to educate the lazy.
Are you kidding?
Some g.m.s are busy and to provide some research on picks that ANYONE can make provides a service to the league. Having a couple of g.m.s snap up the lion's share of prospects is not in the league's best interests. Look at your own prospect rankings!! Over half the league has bare cupboards of prospects. Don't be so greedy Buffalo! Geez.
Relax guys he was trying to help out and frankly I don't see anyone that a) wasn't obvious ala Moss or b)that is going to make a big impact and yes I already knew about 90% of these players.
__________________
Season 5 BRHL 1 Champion Season 1 BRHL Euro Champion Season 1 BRHL Juniors Champion
I have to say I lean more torwards the side of not sharing. I think it hurts the research and work that other GMs do.
I understand that some leagues will have master lists. But for the most part there isn't one for the BRHL2.
I think that it sets a bad precedent. It allows GMs to depend on a list and not work for a draft. If we were to issue a master list annually, we'd likely see a little drop in preperation. As well as if we dropped doing a list, we'd also hurt some GMs who counted on it.
Overall, I'm speaking a little bit in the future, but I don't think it's a good practice. Let the GMs seperate themselves from each other. Last time I checked the skill set from each GM wasn't a level playing field.
__________________
"As long as those gnome elite molecules emerge, we certainly can reduce casualties. Their warplanes troops would be nice."
I have to say I lean more torwards the side of not sharing. I think it hurts the research and work that other GMs do.
I understand that some leagues will have master lists. But for the most part there isn't one for the BRHL2.
I think that it sets a bad precedent. It allows GMs to depend on a list and not work for a draft. If we were to issue a master list annually, we'd likely see a little drop in preperation. As well as if we dropped doing a list, we'd also hurt some GMs who counted on it.
Overall, I'm speaking a little bit in the future, but I don't think it's a good practice. Let the GMs seperate themselves from each other. Last time I checked the skill set from each GM wasn't a level playing field.
If that were the case, there wouldn't be a need for NHL Central Scouting. GMs have a staff of plenty in the NHL, we have a staff of one or two.
I don't care if there is either way, but to chastise someone for offering their effort isn't right.